Mike Linford

Looks like it's still failing, but apparently we should try to use a newer version of the jetty plugin: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26496338/strange-java-lang-arrayindexoutofboundsexception-thrown-on-jetty-startup

So you're saying that if, for example, somebody's IE test fails and doesn't clean it up, it will *not* get cleaned up if the next person runs Chrome?

Arise, dead thread! Arise, and send people spam! @bryantrobbins I looked at #59 but I'm not sure it's what you were hoping for. As I read it, getStringOrDefault() as implemented...

Daniel's description is correct. I probably should have included InteractiveElement in the description too, since that's what I'm most concerned with (specifically what happens when an element is clicked). We...

I agree with all of that. Whatever we end up doing it'll be good to keep a couple of factory methods like we do now for simple / common use...

Yeah, the dependency tree is pretty big. The Maven dependency plugin has some features with the `analyze` goal that we can investigate, and I know that the shaded JAR plugin...

Can you elaborate on what the difficulties were in publishing the scaladoc?

@aosama I thought about this a little after we met today. Apparently `Pair` is just an abstract class. So if we made the new wrapper class a decorator for `Pair`...

Since we've apparently decided to do breaking changes anyways, it might not be worth it to go with the suggestion I made (extending `Pair` is a little weird).

Can we make them optional?