Michel Loiseleur

Yes, it can help on some use cases. Thanks for this contribution, @mzealey. Do you think you can add test and documentation on this new parameter ?

Improving the error message seems to be a simple good step on this. I observe also that current example in the doc do not explicitly link service with the router....

For denying IPs, one often needs more than just set a list of IPs. It's the domain of dedicated solution. There is a plugin for it: [DenyIP](https://plugins.traefik.io/plugins/62947363ffc0cd18356a97d1/deny-ip-plugin). I suggest to...

Thanks for your interest in Traefik. Above `rbac.namespaced`, it [says](https://github.com/traefik/traefik-helm-chart/blob/ba5918d221d9a6eb52384f945dbaf31dfe41b384/traefik/values.yaml#L902): > Providers will only watch target namespace If you have an idea on how it can be improved, feel free...

Hello @ananace, Helm is not "breaking" HTTP/3. It's a limitation on Kubernetes side. It's documented [here](https://github.com/traefik/traefik-helm-chart/blob/e404db9e271e939a33ba95bc59f12f8a54e87239/traefik/values.yaml#L680) in the values and [here](https://github.com/traefik/traefik-helm-chart#upgrading-from-17x-to-18x) in the readme. Is that more clear for you...

\o I get it. There are two issues with TCP + UDP on same port , one (already documented) on the `Service` and this one on the `Deployment`. The one...

Since nowadays, default settings on the chart are unprivileged, I guess we can close this issue. Feel free to re-open it if needed.

Since all possible Windows version for _official_ images are now built, I am closing this PR. Feel free to re-open it or create a new one if needed.

Since official images only follow LTS version of Windows Server, I'll close this issue. Feel free to re-open it if needed.

@KyleMartin901 I understand it has been a long time but do you think you can update the [sources part of doc](https://kubernetes-sigs.github.io/external-dns/v0.14.0/sources/sources/) and rebase your PR ? It's looking good.