Michael Krabbe Borregaard
Michael Krabbe Borregaard
@piever do you think this could be a juliadb interaction?
Pass series arguments as row matrix `color=[:green :red]`
you'd have to pass them in "long format" - `plot(["a", "a", "a", "b", "b"], [1,2,3,2,1])`
But - given that `missing` is part of Base Julia, is there any use for a numerical calculation package that does not support it? That sounds quite dangerous.
I see you're right this package is still equally useful in that context. I guess I'm just disappointed as I thought this could be a more broadly useful package, and...
You're right. After looking into it I'm also less certain that the right approach is to change this to treat `missing` like `NaN`. Sorry for the noise.
Would it be out of the question to simply import the Base functions here (silencing the warnings)? In that case I should think all non-Vector{AbstractFloat} calls (which can't have NaNs)...
We're exploring a local solution along the lines of: ```julia import NaNMath _extrema(x...) = Base.extrema(x...) _extrema(x::AbstractVector{
> I thought that only subtypes of AbstractFloat support NaN's and so that would never happen Note that I had a PR implementing this based on exactly this assumption (https://github.com/mlubin/NaNMath.jl/pull/21),...