Misha Padidar

Results 24 comments of Misha Padidar

its looking good. just address the couple comments about documentation and we can get this thing landed.

@smiet is this PR still in progress or should we close?

@joaopedrobiu6 is this PR still in progress or should we close?

I am confused why some of the documentation changes that have already been landed on master look like new changes on your branch. Perhaps your branch point is behind previous...

@abaillod just pinging to check in.

@abaillod friendly reminder

@akaptano have we circumvented this? Should we close? cc @mbkumar

I like the idea of a `For Develoeprs` section. I have a few general comments on organization. 1. We have two sections related to the API: `API Reference: Public Functions...

Thanks for the responses, those are great ideas. I think that we could remove the Public API and just have the full API in the API section. Perhaps we should...

Two changes: 1. Can we move the Simsopt++ C++ API into the API section and rename it `Simsopt C++ API`? 2. Can we rename `simsopt package` in the API Reference...