Minh Dao

The errors seem to contradict, but in fact they don't. 😉 The first one states that anything carrying the same name as a counterpart in its super class should be...

You're right, a `DecoratedBox` doesn't accept a nullable `Decoration?`, which is why you're using a `Container` as a fallback, that does. In my opinion, the linting rule is actually correct,...

I don't think that an optional `decoration` would be weird at all. It just resembles a `Container`, where all parameters are optional to enable optional injection (the primary motivation for...

We'd need to "fix" the newly introduced `use_colored_box`, too. 🙈

It works. But as you seem to have conflicting imports, [this](https://github.com/dint-dev/universal_html/issues/37#issuecomment-953032727) might help you out.

> Given the discussion in #528 on generated `.gitignore` files we should actually remove the toplevel `.gitignore` from the fpm repository. Yes, there is a duplication. But is it better...

I removed the top-level `.gitignore` so it now parallels an fpm project created with `fpm new`. If it ever be decided to use a top-level `.gitignore`, I think we should...

> What does `fpm new` do with regards to `.gitignore`? I don't see any `.gitignore` when I did `fpm new`, but maybe I have an older version. Ah, you're right....

Thanks, @perazz, for opening this issue and all of you for your input and adding the references. I'll take care of it over the next few weeks.

> Great feature, thanks! > > Would you mind resolving the conflict? I can check our internal code for fixed false negatives before landing this. It's now been fixed here:...