Mihail Anton

> @mihai-sysbio do you have other suggested sources besides KEGG? If we were to use the E.C., there should definitely be other sources (above, I linked to BRENDA). Personally I...

> many reactions being assigned similar names Interesting - do reaction names really need to be unique? I was counting on the uniqueness of the identifiers for that, and the...

There are only 2423 KEGG ids in `reactions.tsv` - perhaps it would make more sense to extend the coverage via the MNX ids before mapping the names? edit: with an...

@cherkaos another option is to [mark the PR as a `draft`](https://github.blog/2019-02-14-introducing-draft-pull-requests/) if you prefer, and then mark it as ready for review whenever you feel it has reached that state.

And [here is the link to the corresponding section in _Human-GEM-guide_](https://sysbiochalmers.github.io/Human-GEM-guide/gem_extraction/#prepare-the-metabolic-task-list).

@cherkaos [here's is the link to SysBioChalmers/Human-GEM on Gitter](https://gitter.im/SysBioChalmers/Human-GEM).

A summary of the findings so far: > 443 complexes were found that all the subunits are included in Human-GEM, according to their UniProt ids > 5 complexes that had...

@feiranl found this https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.28.433152v1, which could also come in handy, but it needs to be run on the cluster. The (hypothetical) advantage is that it would require less manual work.

I'd suggest having a look at how this is set up for Yeast-GEM in [this PR](https://github.com/SysBioChalmers/yeast-GEM/pull/239). It uses GH Actions to do both a simple [`memote run`](https://github.com/SysBioChalmers/yeast-GEM/pull/239/files#diff-2b7f1775930527ea1c358a42043dea5ee7df3e38e1fd54d16a03801410e10515) and also [`memote...

Initial thoughts: 1. on every PR (as long as the output is compact) 2. as a PR comment (to keep the repo clean) 3. don't keep anything, as memote's history...