Michael Champion

> Create an 'associate TAG membership' (or whatever you want to call it), where people can get 'drafted' by the TAG and receive an official position to do specific work...

> I'm not a huge fan of @plinss's pool of appointed seats for those who can't get elected. There's a few distinct categories of people here: 1. Those who are...

Closing, no discussion here for more than 2 years, and the AB seems to be discussing it in their private space.

> The idea that a mob of folk uninterested in some particular WG's work get to close down the work in which others are actively participating seems like the cultural...

I'm being swayed by the argument that we need a mechanism to close groups, without a Director to decide, and without consensus by the Team. The current process notes the...

> W3C should be able to take a holistic view of all the ways in which people interact using the web, and the technologies that are needed to support them....

Agree with @frivoal but one friendly amendment: The AC should have an explicit invitation to review works BEFORE they are locked down and the only option is some variation on...

The draft charter says the mission is "identifying, balancing and mitigating the unintended impacts of proposals". Shouldn't Unintended Impacts be the name of the proposed group? Problem is, it's VERY...

I understand but disagree that this proposed charter would be an effective way to ensure that the interests of under-represented stakeholders are considered in W3C. My suggestions for improving the...

> If the membership agreement does not reflect the mission of the W3C then that is an issue for the Process CG. To be pedantic :-) it’s actually an issue...