Michael Champion

@mnot wrote > considering a non-browser implementation as counting for the purpose of gauging interest for an API like Fetch? I'm in favor of exploring this idea. I don't think...

@mnot wrote >The dynamics of a large board are well-known to be different -- including an increased tendency towards compromise. This makes sense, but I'm not readily finding authoritative references...

I'm hoping @mnot means "representative of the kinds of people elected to the TAG over the last 10 years", that is, people with deep expertise in the web platform and...

What Process language describes Director duties covering "checking that the work from the Working Group was done properly - e.g. normative references and horizontal reviews"? I couldn't find any from...

@jeffjaffe : "6.2.3. Advancement on the Recommendation Track" reads to me as if it is the Working Group's responsibility to do those things. Presumably the Director does need to confirm...

Did STV generate winners who were dis-approved by a majority? Was the set of winners under STV significantly more diverse (in terms of geography, gender, web technology specialization, whatever) than...

Insulating the ODC from the election process undermines the rationale for having the entire AB+TAG on the Council, since it gets it’s credibility as a Decider from the electorate. So...

What is the actual proposal we're discussing in this issue? I don't see anything explicit in https://w3c.github.io/w3process/director-free/#w3c-council that a W3C Council is created ad hoc for every formal objection that...

Here’s what I’m suggesting (having internalized the AB feedback that a random subset isn't’ a great way to select the Council): - that there be a yearly election, presumably piggybacked...

Indeed, I don’t concur with the Council proposal: it’s too large, too unwieldy to form and dissolve, the election system isn’t designed to select people to make these kinds of...