Michael Osipov
Michael Osipov
@cstamas @gnodet @hboutemy Is this something we can consider for 4? I don't think it would be appropriate for 3.9.0, but it is opt-in only. WDYT?
@MartinKanters Should I test again after your followups?
We have TLS-based solutions in past releases and we had to revert. What makes this one different?
Is there a reasonable IT for this?
> I can write one for [MNG-7474](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7474). [MNG-7401](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7401) is an internal behavior and would require a junit test rather than an IT imho. I guess so that would be best
@jvanzyl Without looking deeply into this, it looks like a massive commit with a model change. This should be in 3.4 or later. @nitram509 You have refomatted some code to...
This PR hides the fact that the input data is invalid. Obviously, we need a `MetadataValidator`.
I see two issues: * Modello generates a broken model therefore you assume the prefix to be optional. * The complete absence of a `MetadataValidator`. Would have expected that we...
> Both issues are correct but are rather follow-ups to [MNG-7375](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-7375). My question is about how to deal with a missing prefix within `Metadata.merge` (this can happen even if the...