Michael Hucka

@YZNIU For purposes of planning work and doing repository housekeeping, could you let us know what the status of this is? Was this tutorial ever added to TFQ?

Due to time constraints, we have to prioritize more aggressively. I'm closing this as not essential and unlikely to be pursued. If this is incorrect, please feel free to reopen...

Discussed during [bit.ly/cirq-cynq](http://bit.ly/cirq-cynq) today (2024-10-16): probably the solution is to disallow 0 qubit inputs and add validation to `IdentityGate`, because this is a situation that doesn't make sense physically.

Discussed during [bit.ly/cirq-cynq](http://bit.ly/cirq-cynq) today (2024-10-16): it should do either numeric validation, or or adjust the shift. (Note that the global shift could be symbolic.)

Closing due to age (6+ years since first opened) and prioritization. If this is in error, someone please feel free to reopen this.

Discussed during [bit.ly/cirq-cynq](http://bit.ly/cirq-cynq) today (2024-10-16): the conclusion is Cirq slhould either fully support the serialization or raise an error. Fully supporting it would is the preferred outcome.

Discussed during [bit.ly/cirq-cynq](http://bit.ly/cirq-cynq) today (2024-10-16): although the original example came from a QASM circuit definition, the problem itself is not related to QASM.

Closing due to age and lack of activity.

This is due to an ongoing problem with Colab. We filed an issue in the Colab repo op Friday (https://github.com/googlecolab/colabtools/issues/5141). One of our team members also submitted a patch for...

@MichaelBroughton This is a very old issue. It looks like 679 was closed some time ago. Can this issue also be closed, or is there something that still needs to...