Michael Hucka

I tagged this to be discussed at the next Cirq Cynq. A change like this strikes me as a breaking change. I see in the [comments on #5688](https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq/issues/5688#issuecomment-1211131814) this concerns...

Discussed in Cirq Cynq 2025-05-14: it's not clear if this is a breaking change. In general, the feeling is that improving the diagrams and making them more standard and readable...

@lockwo @MichaelBroughton This issue has not been active for a long time. Was the problem ever resolved? Can this issue be closed?

Discussed in Cirq Cynq 2025-04-30: trying to recall the reasons for the current design (which is a tuple, not a set), the sense is that it was probably created at...

@babacry (I apologize for my ignorance) Can you elaborate about what "setify" tags are?

@splch Thank you for this work! Could you let us know the status of this? For example, there was the comment from @Cynocracy to add a test, but it's not...

> @dstrain115 this is a good question. The answer is unfortunately yes, but it's attempting to _revert_ a change in interface caused by #6652 (which made it so that jobs...

@splch There's also a cirq-ionq issue at https://github.com/quantumlib/Cirq/issues/5216 that we were wondering about. It's unrelated to this PR, but if you're doing work on cirq-ionq and have a few moment...

Discussed in Cirq Cynq 2025-04-30: the example that succeeds may be succeeding due to a different reason (eg type coercion). We need to look at the operations that PauliString supports,...

> I apologize for how long it's taking to resolve formatting issues. No need for apologies at all! What would make it easier to catch format issues these earlier? I...