Matthew

Thank you @BrunoLiegiBastonLiegi for the comprehesive comments. I have a question that I need advice. Instead of doing a inverse of the circuit to do state preparation, could we instead...

> > Thank you @BrunoLiegiBastonLiegi for the comprehesive comments. I have a question that I need advice. Instead of doing a inverse of the circuit to do state preparation, could...

> I don't know, I am not sure why this is needed and how they propose to address this in the original paper, but, especially since `GST` is particularly useful...

> > The set of basis operations that I use is taken from this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.12509. Here, Ryuji introduces state preparations as basis operations instead of post-selection in the original...

> * It's annoying that you have to call `execute_GST` on each gate of your desired set. In my opinion GST should only need to know the set of gates...

> @mho291 @AlejandroSopena I am working on the tests right now, but I have a doubt. Are the matrices that you get from `GST` the superoperator representations of the input...

> > Hi @BrunoLiegiBastonLiegi yup, the function outputs a matrix in the Pauli Transfer Matrix notation, which is one of the superoperator representations. > > Ok thanks, but then there...

> > Hi @BrunoLiegiBastonLiegi, I've checked both the `to_pauli_liouville` code and my original code and both are correct. What is wrong is my initial comment; I made an error. So...

Thank you @rmshaffer for pointing that out! Let me provide a little more background to my query. I'm part of the [Qibo](https://github.com/qiboteam/qibo/pulls) team, and one of the recent developments in...

Hi @BrunoLiegiBastonLiegi, thank you for providing useful comments. The code I wrote for PEC works as what you've described. One can call the PEC function directly, for example: ``` #...