Maximilian Hils comments

Results 653 comments of


                                            Maximilian Hils

WireGuard keylog file

Thanks! Forking boringtun over this is not worth the added maintenance cost unfortunately. Could you please try to get upstream boringtun to include your changes? I'm happy to track a...

WireGuard keylog file

> What do you think about this approach? That actually sounds worse than tracking a fork. As much as I understand that you would like to have this shipped, I...

ApparmorProfile should be updated in place when is complain mode and missing permissions are detected

Just to make sure this isn't lost: AppArmor does _not_ log access requests to auditd that have been denied by an explicit `deny` rule. To get these signals, one needs...

Binaries for Alpine Linux in x86_64 and aarch64

Currently, the recommended solution for musl-based distros is to use our Docker images. Please upvote @nmaguiar's post if you think we should prioritize this. :)

Stub file information doesn't seem to be included from `_lib.pyi`

One workaround here is to put your type annotations into `__init__.pyi`.

Stub file information doesn't seem to be included from `_lib.pyi`

If you have a patch please send it, really depends on how much complexity we're adding. :)

fix: checkout pull request head ref

Thank you! Merged in bc5ced8eb06a573b53ab024e167aad1f4006e90f.

Can we use `permissions` in `workflow` instead of requiring install the GitHub App?

Unfortunately no. `permissions` is not enough to fix PRs from forks.

Can we use `permissions` in `workflow` instead of requiring install the GitHub App?

For non fork PRs, you can skip autofix.ci entirely and just use Git commands. This is out of scope for autofix.ci. :)

autofix-ci/action failed due to `fatal: couldn't find remote ref refs/pull/*/head`

https://github.com/autofix-ci/action/pull/24