Martin Geisler

Hi @daym, I updated the branch with my suggestion above. If you sign the CLA, then we can merge this. Thanks!

> Yes, I took a look and that looks good to me! > > Also, I've signed the CLA now. Thanks a lot!

Hi @wulianglongrd, Not yet, I'm afraid. I will have to sit down at some point and invest the time in this!

Hi @50-Course, I think the most likely result will be that someone else ends up releasing videos of the course material. I was asked the [same thing on Reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/13obodm/comment/jqjv6ii/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3) and...

Sorry folks, I don't think I'll have time for this anytime soon. Note that anybody could take the material we've published and start a video series about it (but it'a...

Oh my... That looks super weird indeed. I wanted to write "Rust assumes that...".

> Rust assumes raw pointers may have special concurrency considerations. Thanks, I like this phrasing! Let's go with that for now :smile:

Hi @Arthur-Milchior, thanks for raising this! You have a great point. As I've written here and there, I work on Android — I'm part of Android Security we promote Rust...

Hi @rachfop, thank you! It's great that we can align the documentation with our other documentation. > I understand this is a large PR - it is intended to follow...

Hi @rachfop, I think your PR has a lot of good stuff in it, so I'll try to cherry-pick the changes over.