Mattias Fält

Could you post a minimal example where this occurs, that makes it easier for us to test and afterwards verify if it's solved. Does the behavior change if you use...

We should definetely get rid of internal calls to `tf`, `zpk` and `ss`, but I'm not sure that there is an obvious way to create the user interface, although it...

> Looks good. I just want to double check with @mfalt so that the `#output` syntax is not needed for Documenter.jl doctests? I don't think those are working properly currently...

@KronosTheLate it is great to see that you want to improve the docs. There is a lot missing, and it is great with input from new users. Most of the...

I agree, we really want the behavior of the operation `+`, it is bad if we accidentally accept vectors where we expect 2x2 for example. However, in the case of...

Thanks for your input. To elaborate on the comment by baggepinnen: We have been taking about this and definitely agree that it should be possible to covert/work with both types...

This is unfortunately a result of us switching to a differential equations solver for simulating continuous systems. If zero-order-hold is used to simulate a system, this is not a problem,...

Yes, the general problem is that it is tricky to compute where the bode plot should start. Thus `bode` assumes that the first frequency in the vector is "small enough",...

I think that if the elements of the matrices (either A,B,C,D) are complex, there is little reason to throw an error at the user. I say either Allow it or...

I think this looks reasonable. @baggepinnen @olof3 ? @JuliaControlBot test-plots