methylDragon
methylDragon
Oh, the conservative joint limits just makes moveit take a lot of weird trajectories as opposed to when they're more accurate. Also, since my helper pickup ready position commander script...
Just gonna ping @jparisu since they were engaging with a closely related problem in the listed issues
Are you setting a string? If you're setting a string, the default bound for the string length is 255. [create_string_builder](https://www.eprosima.com/docs/fast-rtps/2.3.0/html/classeprosima_1_1fastrtps_1_1types_1_1_dynamic_type_builder_factory.html#a8a00a390ec249dd1dbbd04415d6fb68d) (uint32_t bound=[MAX_STRING_LENGTH](https://www.eprosima.com/docs/fast-rtps/2.3.0/html/namespaceeprosima_1_1fastrtps_1_1types.html#af7a3e2e0700a3624cb600b77600efe74)) [const int32_t MAX_STRING_LENGTH = 255](https://www.eprosima.com/docs/fast-rtps/2.3.0/html/namespaceeprosima_1_1fastrtps_1_1types.html#af7a3e2e0700a3624cb600b77600efe74) So just set...
Hey! Before I do my review, can I double check that this PR is just concerned with splitting the ROS args so there's no case where a command parser mutates...
I wonder if we should do this: ``` ros2 run ros1_bridge \ [dynamic_bridge|parameter_bridge] [Bridge specific arguments] \ --ros1-args [ROS1 arguments] \ --ros2-args [ROS2 arguments] ``` And also continue to support...
[](https://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_packaging_linux/552/)
> > I tested this with shlex.split() and it seems like it splits it up instead of pre-expanding the command. > > My understanding is that any of our substitutions...
> CI: > > * Linux [](http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_linux/19570/) > * Linux-aarch64 [](http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_linux-aarch64/14082/) > * Windows [](http://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_windows/20294/) Return code `None` 😱 😱 😱
> it fails at runtime with `Creating the kubernetes client set failed: The gcp auth plugin has been removed. Please use the "gke-gcloud-auth-plugin" kubectl/client-go credential plugin instead.` Yep! This is...
> This seems related to [this](https://github.com/ros2/rcl/issues/375#issuecomment-458330910) and [this](https://github.com/ros2/rcl/issues/1034). Thanks for this! When I wrote this design, I was trying to avoid duplications from remaps, though anonymous nodes would help with...