Simeon H.K. Fitch
Simeon H.K. Fitch
This can definitely be purged. It's used in a few edge cases, only as a convenience because it was transitively included years ago.
@vpipkt Odd: https://travis-ci.org/locationtech/rasterframes/builds/576845586#L962-L975
@vpipkt I think something's wrong with the implementation, because in this test case the scheme resolution should *not* be attempting to use the GDAL reader if it's not available, yet...
@vpipkt Not 100% sure what's going on here, but don't want to be extra sure the JVM fallback reader still gets selected in non-GDAL scenarios. Wonder if we should leverage...
@vpipkt Once this weirdness is resolved, should we be trying to use this (if memory serves, written by Azavea folk!)?: https://gdal.org/user/virtual_file_systems.html#vsihdfs-hadoop-file-system
@jamesmcclain Thanks for the background color... sounds to me like we shouldn't go that route if we don't have to.
@vpipkt > I suspect perhaps we ought to be pip installing versus conda installing these I'm worried if we go back to pip we'll run into the problem with packages...
NB: `setup.py` would be responsible for writing out `__version__.py`, or however else the Python build wants to do based on the values in `RFBuildInfo`.
@jdenisgiguere do you happen to have a public version of `s3a://geoimagery/geotrellis_geoimagery/` we could use to replicate the issue?