Simeon H.K. Fitch

Results 210 comments of Simeon H.K. Fitch

@vpipkt Any clue if this is still an issue? Not quite sure how this use case is any different from other standard use cases.

Confirmed: Temporal component is discarded... https://github.com/s22s/raster-frames/blob/4434e36b825374d93c3002091df0b2c34bd045b1/src/main/scala/astraea/spark/rasterframes/RasterFrameMethods.scala#L150-L154 ... with merges according to however `tileToLayout` wants to do it: https://github.com/s22s/raster-frames/blob/4434e36b825374d93c3002091df0b2c34bd045b1/src/main/scala/astraea/spark/rasterframes/RasterFrameMethods.scala#L162

To close this out, add ScalaDoc to explicitly state this behavior.

Should just require creating an `Int` version of this: https://github.com/s22s/raster-frames/blob/5fb23a260d514478c5480f847572b90104326b30/src/main/scala/astraea/spark/rasterframes/functions/AggregateHistogramFunction.scala#L32

``` "Stack Trace";"Sample Count";"Percentage(%)" "geotrellis.raster.merge.SinglebandTileMergeMethods$class.merge(SinglebandTileMergeMethods, Extent, Extent, Tile, ResampleMethod)";"1,277";"61.721" " geotrellis.raster.package$withTileMethods.merge(Extent, Extent, Tile, ResampleMethod)";"1,277";"61.721" " geotrellis.raster.package$withTileMethods.merge(Extent, Extent, Object, ResampleMethod)";"1,277";"61.721" " geotrellis.spark.tiling.CutTiles$$anonfun$apply$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(Tuple2)";"1,277";"61.721" " geotrellis.spark.tiling.CutTiles$$anonfun$apply$1$$anonfun$apply$2.apply(Object)";"1,277";"61.721" ```

Could probably be addressed with the maven equivalent of `sbt-buildinfo`

> I think you can decode it as an `Value::List`: https://docs.rs/duckdb/latest/duckdb/types/enum.Value.html#variant.List Is there a way of doing this without having to iterate over `Vec` and convert each element into `f64`,...

I have a similar use case, and ended up here.

Since this crate already uses `tracing`, and the user can select [OpenTelemetry][1] as the subscriber, wouldn't additional instrumentation of calls be sufficient integration to support OTEL? Or is it more...

I have the same issue.