Matt Stinson

There are practically two options here: 1) Monte Carlo type analysis (mentioned above)

The block has been restructured based on the previous discussion. Note that the initial scale of the block is 0.04 to be in alignment with the default height of the...

> > Note that the initial scale of the block is 0.04 to be in alignment with the default height of the BooleanExpression block, which this block is expected to...

Ok, so based on the discussion I went ahead and removed the initial scale annotation. Now by default the scale will match the 2nd example in the picture above. I...

Made the minor changes as requested (documentation paragraph changes, removal of getInstanceName(), and changing the wording from terminate to abort). Let me know if anything else, otherwise, looking to approve...

> Please add a test model in ModelicaTest.Blocks together with the comparisonSignals.txt file of the reference variables. Done

> Still missing: a test example. > > Although you are right, the old Power block should be named Exponentiation and the new block should be named Power, > >...

> A name swap should be possible with conversion scripts. > > However, there's also the issue of explaining it and user understanding, and I think a name swap will...

...I did put some thought into this recently, and there are two reasons I came up with: 1) Built-in functions(min, max, sin, cos, log, etc, etc.) are lowercase, so it...

> @mestinso Thank you for you valuable effort! > > What I'd like to have are test models (covering all the branches) where the current imlementation raises an assert, but...