Mandar Chitre
Mandar Chitre
@prasadtiru not urgent, but could you take a look when you have some time?
Yes, saw the `testParam1` failure once on my machine, but haven't been able to replicate it. Will track those 2 down if I see them again.
Looks reasonable, but we won't know the quirks until we try it. Maybe we should be an internal test version with this replacing hterm to test run?
Even better might be to consider moving to Spock :-), and all this is done automagically
Do note that `socket.shutdown()` is meant to shutdown the whole system (including server), and not just close the socket. `socket.close()` is the right call to just close the socket and...
@YairMZ you'd want to shutdown the server only if you want to reboot a modem or shutdown the simulator. In normal circumstances, you'd only want to close the connection to...
@YairMZ @notthetup OK, I misread the original post and misinterpreted the `socket` as a `UnetSocket`. You're right, calling `gw.close()` should simply close the underlying TCP socket and not be expected...
I have not used PyCharm, and don't have any idea why it would not work in it. If you happen to trace details to find the root cause, we can...
Leaving this still as "experimental" in 1.8. This will require much more thought at an architectural level, and perhaps a 2.0 feature.
We may want to consider implementing this for performance reasons. @notthetup The way to do it could be to share a `wanstMessageFor` list instance across fjåge gateways in a single...