Michael Baudis

@nicolevasilevsky I don't have the resources to provide a sssom'd version; but more than that I wouldn't know how to express the ICD-O pairs correctly. Internally we just concatenate them...

The new tree is now reflected in EFO, including the the `high-level copy number loss` class added during GA4GH VRS 1.3. alignment. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols4/ontologies/efo/classes/http%253A%252F%252Fwww.ebi.ac.uk%252Fefo%252FEFO_0030063?lang=en

@balhoff At a first glance, negated may be better served as an attribute of the OntologyTerm object. Also, not the first request for this. Would also be in line with...

@cmungall Sorry, trying comments on the phone... So, to go with the example linked by @balhoff : I'd prefer ``` types: - id: HP:0001711 label: Abnormality of the left ventricle...

> Another option would be to make negation a property of the association @cmungall Yes; I had this thought, too; seems natural. But I haven't really worked myself into thinking...

> It seems that both are pretty much equivalent, and the excluded would pertain to the association in this case. > I thought the choice to keep negated type separated...

I think @cmungall means the modification of the object structure (which may introduce its own problems). There is in fact another option - you can have a wrapper for each...

The structure above would be suited well for e.g. the concept of wrapping a single disease/phenotype instance, e.g. for description of a biosample. Also, additional quantifiers/qualifiers could be used (quality:...

O.k. good catch; fix PR?

@mfiume The _currently_ working way would be to use a handover item (i.e. link object) to point to a data file/stream. You could stick with GA4GH specs by providing then...