Matt Caswell

> does your patch make that special caseing of the gost signatures superfluous? Yes it does look that way. Except that special casing does some interesting things with checking consistency...

> I should be able to cook something up quickly with tlsfuzzer (for server part), would that be acceptable to you @vdukhovni and @mattcaswell ? Thanks for the offer! Are...

Skipping GOST would probably be fine.

> > Thanks for the offer! Are you suggesting something that we could integrate into our existing tls_fuzzer external tests? > > yes Fantatic - that would be amazing. Thanks.

Great. Thanks for the update.

@tomato42 - I've extended the OpenSSL external tlsfuzzer test to incorporate all of the tests you provided for the server part. This seems to be working ok and as expected....

> Is there still a blocker to get this PR finished? Mainly my time available to work on it (and I am out-of-the office for a while now).