Mats Dufberg

I cannot see that it is wrong to have generated MO files in the distribution package. You probably have to install more binaries on the target system to build there....

@marc-vanderwal, is your suggestion that "make dist" should automatically run "make all" first? If that is the only change that you suggest then I am not against it. Do you...

We have everything in the public repositories. Instructions are found in https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster/blob/master/docs/internal/maintenance/ReleaseProcess-create-docker-image.md Docker files: * https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster-ldns/blob/master/Dockerfile * https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster-engine/blob/master/Dockerfile * https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster-cli/blob/master/Dockerfile Is that what you ask for?

The Docker image is available on Docker Hub. Isn't that enough? What is missing?

@TaaviE, we have discussed to make Zonemaster-Backend and Zonemaster-GUI available too, but it is not on the direct roadmap yet. I think you are the first to ask for it....

It looks like this issue was created on wrong assumptions.

> Do you want everything sent to develop, or should I just drop the commits that are problematic? The domain name change in the `t` file will make CI fail...

Please create the PR against the develop branch. If you click "edit" in the top you can change or I can do it.

I do not see the problem with today's solution where 1-99% used to indicate the progress.

There are two purposes of "progress", one is to encode the state of the test. The other is provide the data for the progress bar on GUI. For the latter...