Mats Dufberg

I think you mean the message tag and its meaning, not the msgid that is outputted. I suggest that we talk about "message tags" to make that clear. > 2....

@mattias-p, could you give an example on what changes you want to see? Is this just about the message tags, or is this also about the message IDs? Previous `DNSCheck`...

I moved this issue to Zonemaster-Engine, and then consider it to be an implementation error. It seems to be incorrect that Zone09 outputs Z09_INCONSISTENT_MX_DATA ("The MX RRset data is inconsistent...

``` $ zonemaster-cli --show-testcase --test Zone09 masternerd.net --level info --raw 0.00 INFO Unspecified GLOBAL_VERSION version=v7.1.0 0.82 WARNING Zone09 Z09_INCONSISTENT_MX_DATA 0.82 INFO Zone09 Z09_MX_DATA mailtarget_list=smtpin.rzone.de.; ns_ip_list=172.64.49.209;2606:4700:52::ac40:31d1 0.82 INFO Zone09 Z09_MX_DATA mailtarget_list=smtpin.rzone.de.;...

First an update of the specification so that it is more specific and includes test of TTL. Also test scenarios have to be extended.

I do not think https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2181#section-5.2 is relevant since it refer to the TTL of the members of an RRset in a response from one server, as I read it. Instead...

I think we should introduce TTL check whenever we update test cases that check consistency between servers.

@d4nys3k, thank you for taking your time to make suggestions! Comments and feed-back from the users are valuable. The implementation that you have commented follows (or at least should follow)...

Thanks for pointing that out. It does not seem that RFC 2182 is fully consistent in its recommendations (it is a BCP). Please write you suggestion for the "algorithm" for...

Thank you. We will look your issue and the test case specification (and then implementation).