Ben Mares
Ben Mares
> It's certainly straightforward to patch this manually, at least up to the content hash of the lock file itself. I'm not following, what do you mean specifically? > Is...
The `metadata.content_hash` will hopefully be removed sometime soon, as per #432. I'm not sure offhand how well your proposed fix of patching the lockfile would work. I'd recommend trying it...
That would be pretty awesome. Want to write a PR?
Thanks a lot for this! > The code is not really nice At the absolute level maybe not, but given the approach this seems pretty good to me at first...
That all sounds good. I don't expect this to be a common use-case, but for robustness it'd be nice to have a test which exercises both http and file repos...
Moin @FelixSchwarz! Sorry to take so long to come back to this. I had a look and it seems very good. I did a pass of making some changes to...
Oh, I forgot to mention: could you please try opening a PR in requests-file for this? That would be a lot better than the current vendoring solution.
Ya, that failure seems quite odd. I'm rerunning the test in hopes that we get lucky. ``` E conda_lock._vendor.poetry.mixology.failure.SolveFailure: Because -dummy-package- depends on six (*) which doesn't exist, version solving...
Still seeing the same failure after rerunning. :(
Thanks so much @mfisher87 for jumping in on this! You're spot-on. I wonder why this regressed.