manx

I second this request. From my perspective, a filesystem-wide mount option would suffice. I am also very much annoyed by software that tries to be "smart" and disables corruption resilience,...

Well, that's really a phenomenal attitude for a library that exclusively deals with user data ... > Unaligned access on little-endian processors (and multi-endian processors in little-endian mode) is well-defined...

> We only fix bugs that cause incorrect behavior with no sanitizers enabled... The sanitizers itself might cause issues that don't manifest on normal running environment. As such we also...

Look, I was only asking to change your defaults. Any user who is of the same opinion as you would still be able to use the incorrect code paths at...

> It's common practice to first issue warning and then change that to error in subsequent versions... And again you are relying only on exemplatory evidence, which does not and...

Can you link respective bug reports for the sanitizers? Edit: Sorry, i meant to say sanitizers.

I assume you cannot, because such problems do not exist. If a sanitizer replaces allocation functions, it does so honoring their respective standard's requirements regarding alignment. **If** the alignment provided...

Fine, let's wait what others have to say.

> There are some differences in configure and cmake build scripts. In CMake, we do detection based on architecture to see if unaligned access is supported. As far as I...

> You are always free to open a pull request here if you think you have a better way of doing something. I would rather first ensure that zlib-ng's goals...