Marc Nuri

Results 829 comments of Marc Nuri

### Eclipse JKube [CI Report](https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/ci) Started new GH workflow run for https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/jkube/pull/3171 (_2024-06-18T00:07:23Z_) :gear: [JKube E2E Tests (9556585898)](https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/ci/actions/runs/9556585898) - :x: [Bootstrap CI test run (#3171)](https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/ci/actions/runs/9556585898/job/26342156240) - :x: [K8S ${{ matrix.kubernetes...

### Eclipse JKube [CI Report](https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/ci) Started new GH workflow run for https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/jkube/pull/2982 (_2024-10-25T05:03:57Z_) :gear: [JKube E2E Tests (11512176911)](https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/ci/actions/runs/11512176911) - :x: [Bootstrap CI test run (#2982)](https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/ci/actions/runs/11512176911/job/32046785430) - :x: [K8S ${{ matrix.kubernetes...

Protobuf is not supported at the moment, adding the header will only cause Kubernetes API to respond with a protobuf binary that can't be parsed by the client.

### Eclipse JKube [CI Report](https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/ci) Started new GH workflow run for https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/jkube/pull/2991 (_2024-04-29T05:22:03Z_) :gear: [JKube E2E Tests (8855420699)](https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/ci/actions/runs/8855420699) - :heavy_check_mark: [Bootstrap CI test run (#2991)](https://github.com/eclipse-jkube/ci/actions/runs/8855420699/job/24359736974) - :heavy_check_mark: [K8S v1.25.13 dockerfile...

@kiratkumar47 [`first-timers-only`](https://github.com/eclipse/jkube/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3Afirst-timers-only) tagged issues are created for newcomers who are contributing to the project for the first time so that they can complete legal requirements and get familiar with project....

Quarkus 3.20 is using Kubernetes Client 7.1.0: https://github.com/quarkusio/quarkus/blob/776465775f7002fca4f17e799d0ecca0155060c4/pom.xml#L72 I think the issue is https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/issues/7037 Which was fixed in https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/pull/7043 And was included in https://github.com/fabric8io/kubernetes-client/releases/tag/v7.2.0 Would it make sense to update...

Yes, #47658. Let's see what Chris thinks about this.

> Also, we are sure this upgrade won't break the access to older clusters? Yes, the Kubernetes Client is not tied to a specific cluster version. Since a long time...