Manjinder

/remove-lifecycle stale

@iBrandyJackson @sheneska Apologies for late reply. Thank you for reviewing. I will take a look and pick this up now.

@jooola @nickfloyd I was looking at this request and I scanned [permissions](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/permissions?apiVersion=2022-11-28) and [workflow runs](https://docs.github.com/en/rest/actions/workflow-runs?apiVersion=2022-11-28) today, but it doesn't look like it's possible yet. Thoughts ?

We have a custom Identity Provider, that for some reason supports other entities as ‘aud’ rather than ClientID, and the authorized party sends ClientID as part of ‘azp’ in the...

Makes sense i believe. We can make it optional to satisfy both server and client implementations, and the verifier config can be adjusted accordingly. Aldo, thanks for suggesting the Claims...

Although, I am having second thoughts about keeping the test case since it requires managed labels and annotations to be set in the test environment, not sure if that will...

> @manjinder-mckc did you still plan on working on this? @rjbez17 yes, i just got caught up with other stuff and couldn't get it to it. But I will update...

/reopen /remove-lifecycle rotten