Guennadi Liakhovetski comments

Results 205 comments of


                                            Guennadi Liakhovetski

Convert the mixer component to use the module interface

> @lyakh the quick answer is irrespective of the input:output configuration, modules that require deep buffering will not be able to do a simple copy. I think we can safely...

[IPC4] make sure not to modify host memory window contents

> Also the wording "have to make sure ... window isn't modified by DSP" might need to be extended. This itself is not forbidden, but given our current design how...

[IPC4] make sure not to modify host memory window contents

CI: a single expected sof-logger failure with IPC4 https://sof-ci.01.org/sofpr/PR6426/build1956/devicetest/?model=TGLU_RVP_NOCODEC_IPC4ZPH&testcase=check-sof-logger

[IPC4] make sure not to modify host memory window contents

> @lyakh maybe best to split this PR into smaller chunks, i.e so that less controversial patches can be merged. @lgirdwood it might be easier technically but it wouldn't be...

Update logic for sharing buffers and components

> @ranj063 @lyakh Ok to close? This has been open as non-draft for more than a year... @kv2019i I think it can be closed, yes, but let's wait for what...

topology2: cavs-nocodec: Add an intermediate pipeline

how is this related to #6131 ? EDIT: ok, that one is topology1, sorry, ignore this

ipc4: invalidate host mailbox cache after IPC completion

the second commit in this PR has been superseded by #6433

ipc4: invalidate host mailbox cache after IPC completion

> @lyakh any update ? @lgirdwood let's wait with this, let's first merge the `const` PR, then we'll see

ipc4: invalidate host mailbox cache after IPC completion

the second commit in this PR has been superseded by #6433

coherent: WIP: poison the uncache alias when object is locked.

> > Looks like it could be done in principle. This would only work on objects, actually shared between cores, marked as shared, of course. BTW, thinking about this, maybe...