Guennadi Liakhovetski

> @lyakh Can you check do it still breaks llext? @softwarecki why do you think it's fixed now? What's been changed compared to that version? I compared and I don't...

> > @softwarecki why do you think it's fixed now? What's been changed compared to that version? I compared and I don't see any changes that would fix it. `buildinfo`...

> @softwarecki I'm talking about `buildinfo` not the manifest @softwarecki ...and sorry for a delay - that comment was sitting in my browser for days, I must've forgotten to press...

> @lyakh The `buildinfo` structure is not propagated up because there is no need for it. For llext modules it is retrieved in the `llext_manager_link` function and checked in `llext_manager_allocate_module`...

@softwarecki please merge this diff with your "lib_manager: modules: move native lib support to lib_manager" (and also add a description, it certainly deserves one) [20240403-1-sof-ldmod.gitdiff.txt](https://github.com/thesofproject/sof/files/14850402/20240403-1-sof-ldmod.gitdiff.txt) then I'll be able to...

@softwarecki @kv2019i @lgirdwood can we merge this one instead of #8974 - the first 3 commits are identical and the fourth one looks good to me too

> We cannot allow register module with NULL pointer in md->ops or anything else. Untile module_adapter is not obsolete, llext need second separate condition. @pjdobrowolski could you please read the...

> Ok, I see but why do you extends modules type? Are llext modules compatible with IADK? @pjdobrowolski now sure what you mean by "extending the module type" - yes,...

Let's split this into two. This one now only contains the revert, which raised objections, and the separate fix went into #8933

@ShriramShastry could you please explain in simple terms what exactly you're trying to optimise in this PR - which algorithms you find non-optimal, how you replace them, and - very...