Lev Kozlov

> > Is there any interest in migrating [`jaxopt.BoxOSQP`](https://jaxopt.github.io/stable/_autosummary/jaxopt.BoxOSQP.html#jaxopt-boxosqp)? There is some recent interest within the robotics community in the development of JAX-based controllers to be used in closed-loop simulations...

I believe the initial pose is held due specific `actuators` in `default` section. ```xml ``` This line of the original `UR5e` xml description tells the simulator that the joints are...

Hi @stephane-caron, I'm excited to share that qpax has been successfully released on PyPI! 🎉 I've also addressed the minor changes you pointed out in the PR. When you have...

Hi @stephane-caron, I have updated the code according to your comments, waiting peacefully for the next review :)

Hello @stephane-caron, I have tuned to tolerances to pass the tests with `qpax`, however I have found that there are some problems which are feasible, but `qpax` raises an error....

Thanks, @stephane-caron, for guiding me! I have carefully reviewed all the failing tests and reported problems in the original library. Here is the list of issues: - https://github.com/kevin-tracy/qpax/issues/4 - https://github.com/kevin-tracy/qpax/issues/5...

Hi @stephane-caron, I believe I've addressed all the remaining points for this PR: 1. **Documentation:** I've added documentation to the core functions. While the quality might still need some refinement,...

I have enabled the tests corresponding to the solved issues. There are only two tests failing due mismatch in linear and box multipliers. Hope they will be resolved after https://github.com/kevin-tracy/qpax/issues/9

It seems that using `solution.is_optimal` is the best approach for future tests! 😊 During the update, I encountered a minor issue with version mismatches — it was necessary to bump...

Thanks @stephane-caron! I am really glad to contribute. Really proud of bringing something to the community, getting feedback and learning from others. Looking forward for new opportunities!)