Luke Warlow

That specific case we should treat as invalid. Chromium reports it as invalid but then treats it as valid because of a bug in their parser.

That latter bit is intentional from discussions we've had before.

Yeah you're right this seems to come from the disconnect between Trusted Types and CSP. Not sure on the best way to spec this tbh. Potentially we should allow it...

> Shouldn't those be announced at least? The meeting in question is an Igalia project update meeting so is "private" in that sense. it just also happens to have lots...

@otherdaniel can you comment on whether these messages are important for compatability? I agree that generally these should be left to the browser to decide. Or these should be specced...

@koto you're probably best placed to answer this concretely. My understanding is that for TT we don't care about realms. The threat model for TT is untrusted strings being used...

It would be nice if there was a way to opt into standardised behaviour. Perhaps a new attribute for select? A big part of this standardisation work (imo) is to...

So I have a question about this? If "Caveat that we are still going to not do selection-follows-focus anywhere in the new mode." is true (which I really hope it...