Lucian Vanghele

@iamseth can you please take a look and maybe approve this PR? I really think it's way better to use sort of standard for all exporters especially in large environments...

I kind of disagree: having to change security settings to stay secure doesn't mean it is something experimental. All softwares around have to be updated in order to stay safe...

can you please review this ? people are keep looking at this package with distrust tx

> it will bring everything included in the exporter-toolkit/web

> Hi @lucian-vanghele thanks for the PR and sorry for the long delay. Would you mind rebasing your branch (and fixing the conflicts) so I can start testing this? Thanks!...

thanks for the comments. regarding exporter toolkit status please see [https://github.com/prometheus/exporter-toolkit/issues/45 ](url) so I think experimental part is pretty obsolete by now. (and yes, the package is used in a...

@fstab any updates on this one?

> @lucian-vanghele @mlhmz SSL (TLS) support for exposing metrics is coming in the next release, targeted within the month. is this a thing or not yet?

@fstab - are you still maintaining this exporter? Can you please take a look on all these PRs?

#339