Lukáš Kotek

@yanan-fu Hi, can you review, please? I tested the changes using RHEL-8.8 and `mc-4.8.19` package as an example. As a result package was installed and locked properly on the guest.

> @lkotek Could you please add the bug id in the description, thanks! Sure thing, I just added it.

> LGTM > > Hi @lkotek , would you please provide the test result? thanks! Sure, just let me run it again. (The last test run I did used previous...

> > LGTM > > Hi @lkotek , would you please provide the test result? thanks! > > Sure, just let me run it again. (The last test run I...

Hi @mcasquer and @nickzhq, I just tested the patch with RHEL 10: ``` JOB LOG : /root/avocado/job-results/job-2025-01-28T07.38-1f7f8ad/job.log (1/1) Host_RHEL.m10.u0.ovmf.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.10.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.hotplug_memory.after.guest_reboot.hotplug.backend_file.policy_default.two.q35: STARTED (1/1) Host_RHEL.m10.u0.ovmf.qcow2.virtio_scsi.up.virtio_net.Guest.RHEL.10.0.x86_64.io-github-autotest-qemu.hotplug_memory.after.guest_reboot.hotplug.backend_file.policy_default.two.q35: PASS (158.65 s) RESULTS : PASS 1 |...

Hi @idorax, I was experimenting a bit with this feature before I noticed issue is already taken :smile: I tried to address it with slightly different approach, you can see...

> Hi @lkotek, thank you very much for letting me know your solution. Currently `provision` supports: > > ``` > artemis .............. Provision guest using Artemis backend > connect .................

Hi @thrix, @idorax was quicker in answering. Let me just confirm what he stated in previous comment :wink:

@idorax What I liked at my original solution was it is lightweight and covers the most of the scenarios, but since there is ansible I think using my solution would...

> Hello @yanan-fu @lkotek, I also refactor the package installation methods, so please help review it as well. Hi @PaulYuuu, I checked the code – especially having in mind https://github.com/autotest/tp-qemu/pull/3688...