Linus Groh
Linus Groh
Having my roots in Python: agreed, this is not needed, nothing wrong with `+= 1`.
> at least the postincr one That seems like a decent compromise, one of the major issues I have with prefix/postfix increment/decrement is that they do slightly different things in...
What should syntax for multiple inheritance look like?
Similarly for conditional returns: ```jakt function foo() { if true { return 42 } } ``` ```cpp #include "runtime/lib.h" void foo(); void foo(){ using _JaktCurrentFunctionReturnType = void; { if (true)...
Arguable this is a typechecker bug more that a codegen one, as the compiler should point out that a fallible operation (array creation) inside a function no marked `throws` is...
As I said: ```cpp VERIFY_NOT_REACHED(); return {} / nullptr / whatever; ``` is a simple and acceptable solution that should work everywhere.
No. You'll need a local checkout, amend the commit, and force push - none of this is possible via the web interface, best to forget that it even exists :^)
This has a conflict
This is a known issue, `javascript:` URL handling needs a full rework for spec compliance.