Lukas Fittl
Lukas Fittl
> @lfittl it's the `planetscale` org. If you can extend the trial, I can get this tested with some real data. Done - extended it until end of January for...
> And some other issues related to warnings and errors as well. Thanks for the report - unfortunately it looks like you skipped the part of the output that was...
Hi @Dtenwolde, Thanks for opening the issue and inquiring on this! Any addition to the grammar that is specific to libpg_query (vs upstream Postgres) has to be viewed in light...
Thanks for reaching out! In my understanding adding custom operators doesn't actually modify the parser - just the parse analysis process that operates on the raw parse output. Since libpg_query...
> The explicit feature ask would then be the tree at `Plan` time, i.e. the [`PlannedStmt` node representation](https://github.com/postgres/postgres/blob/89372d0aaa4a6f0e560acdf9014c5ad66fdde1b1/src/include/nodes/plannodes.h#L46). Makes sense! That is not something we are planning to add to...
Thanks for the PR! I think that makes sense, but it appears we'd have to raise the `go.mod` version to allow using the newer syntax (see https://github.com/pganalyze/pg_query_go/actions/runs/17171245591/job/49052448270?pr=139). Maybe that's reasonable...
Thanks for reaching out! To capture my understanding: - The main use case here is statement splitting - You're looking to recover better from errors, so the parser is not...
> Hi, I have some interest in this functionality and am using a fork. Is this PR likely to be merged more-or-less in its current form? Good question! I've been...
We are testing Windows build in CI (https://github.com/pganalyze/pg_query_go/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L15), however that builds using the Visual Studio build chain, not Mingw. Is there a reason you are relying on Mingw? You might...
> Instead, I tried building it with clang+llvm-18.1.8-x86_64-pc-windows-msvc, but got the following result. > I don't think it can be built with any compiler other than MinGW. Interesting issue -...