Lewis John McGibbney

@HansBrende do you have any issue with us pushing this off to the 2.5 development drive? This has blocked the 2.4 release for months and I don't really have the...

@JulioCCBUcuenca Please address the issue of making librdfa-rdf4j a module within Any23 then push your changes. At that stage I will most likely approve the PR and we can test...

> @lewismc should we not test more thoroughly before merging to master? Maybe a separate branch instead? Yes absolutely. We should also definitely extend the integration tests as well such...

> TBH, I'd be in favor of adding this into version 2.4 rather than 2.3 so we have more time to thoroughly test the module. That is fine with me...

> Remember, that not only the libraries that librdfa uses are old but the librdfa project itself has not being active in a while. Yes but it is compliant with...

@HansBrende https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ANY23/Librdfa-rdf4j+documentation#Librdfa-rdf4jdocumentation-Performance The current implementation does not look particularly favorable for librdfa

@HansBrende > My first thought is: if the performance of this module is not as good as that of our current implementation, then in its current form, what is the...

This upgrade is broken as explained in https://github.com/eclipse/rdf4j/discussions/3916

PR for owlapi available at https://github.com/owlcs/owlapi/pull/1065

Hi @sno2 thanks for registering your interest in improving the toolkit. > ...The advantages of porting to Rust would also include the following... I am very familiar with Rust as...