Lewis John McGibbney

I do want to note that the Class naming issue we've identified above is more widespread across SWEET. Take the following ``` http://sweetontology.net/reprSpaceGeometry/GeometricalObject_0D http://sweetontology.net/reprSpaceGeometry/GeometricalObject_1D http://sweetontology.net/reprSpaceGeometry/GeometricalObject_2D http://sweetontology.net/reprSpaceGeometry/GeometricalObject_3D http://sweetontology.net/reprDataModel/Swath_2D http://sweetontology.net/reprDataModel/Swath_3D http://sweetontology.net/reprSpaceGeometry3D http://sweetontology.net/reprMath/Vector_3D...

OK @graybeal I'll update based on this.

OK @graybeal I've updated based on your suggestions. I wanted to make the following reply however > Except SpaceGeometry3D, which clearly needs an underscore before 3D. This is a file...

@carueda thanks for the comments. I think we should address this in a separate ticket to keep things separate.

Tempted to close this ticked off and to resubmit the suggested *fix* in a separate PR... however I want to clarify what our approach is to the several issues mentioned...

@rduerr FYI

> I think we want to be able to support multiple definitions, I agree with that. The point I made (when this came up during ESIP) was that definitions for...

Hi @smrgeoinfo I updated your comment such that it has numbers... that will make it easier for me to respond. > ... or leaning on the American Geological Institute (AGI)...

I should also say, that if SWEET were to simply become part of Wikidata or WikiPedia or something then I would want it to be atleast available via a named...

@graybeal are you happy with the way the annotation's are proposed in https://github.com/ESIPFed/sweet/pull/201 ?