Lev Levitsky

Can you provide a sample file, or perhaps an instruction how to create one (or both)? I heard about issues when converting data with ion mobility, but I have not...

Thanks for reporting, I will try to implement support for this syntax shortly.

Thanks Yasset, I don't mind fixing this at all, just having a busy weekend celebrating my birthday :) I should be able to have a fix for this on Monday.

As far as I remember, source names must be unique to the sample, while assay names should be unique to the data file. The most obvious cases for non-unique values...

The `source name + assay name` combination should probably always be unique, as a sample can be present in an analysis only once. I just wanted to note that either...

Question I had after @ypriverol talked about this during the call: it is conceivable at least in theory that multiple channels are used in a TMT experiment for the same...

I think non-unique source+assay name should produce a warning or even an error but there should be a way to validate an SDRF for such a case (if an error...

We definitely should improve documentation of technology type because right now it is listed as a required column [in template part of the doc](https://github.com/bigbio/proteomics-sample-metadata/tree/master/templates) but at the same time it's...

One could say that `technology type` is a characteristic of an assay, together with the comment columns that follow. Then we could put it after `assay name`, much like the...

Fine by me. I think column order only matters for human readability. Most humans don't seem to notice the difference as long as the columns are next to each other,...