Georg Ledermann

It seems it's an issue with the ordering of gems in the Gemfile: If searchlogic is the **last** gem defined, it all works fine. But if searchlogic is defined **before**...

Yes, creating scopes the explicit way will work. But I'm looking for a dynamic way. One more example: Right now, with Searchlogic it's possible to find all contacts with an...

One addition: The whole thing with the left join is required to include contacts which does not have any address, too. You may think my example can be reached with...

@zernie I don't use Docker for development because the last time I tried it (a long time ago) there were lots of issues. If it's useful these days, I'd be...

@zernie Regarding `docker-compose-wait`: I'm not convinced that including this would perform better than the existing `wait-for-services.sh` script. It works very well and uses just `netcat` which already exists in the...

Seems like a marshalling issue. Can't reproduce it here. Can you post the database schema of your drafted model? Maybe there is a field type the gem can not handle...

It seems to be a naming conflict. Some has created a fork of vestal_versions to fix this: http://github.com/dfurber/vestal_versions. Hopefully this will be merged into the main repository.

I stumbled upon the same issue. Because tesseract cannot process PDF files, it is required to convert them to images first (e.g. TIFF). The gem is doing this, but uses...

Hey guys, thanks for your great work! To minimize modifications in the existing specs, I suggest adding the following changes: ```diff diff --git a/lib/sepa_king/converter.rb b/lib/sepa_king/converter.rb index ead034f..9dbea7e 100644 --- a/lib/sepa_king/converter.rb...

> Also, something else; am I correct to assume that [this](https://github.com/salesking/sepa_king/blob/master/spec/transaction_spec.rb#L70) block belongs to the `Name` context? If so, I could add the empty hash case [here](https://github.com/salesking/sepa_king/blob/master/spec/transaction_spec.rb#L25) and remove the...