Laurenz

Correct. Because the check in the super show rule is rather naive. Aside from the fallback difference, it also couldn't look through show rules for instance, if there were any.

Interesting. I can't remember anything change that would fix the root cause, so I wonder what changed this case.

Makes sense. I think the `footer` actually predates the page numbering feature.

Ah, it's because Typst doesn't have negative integer literals, so what you're effectively writing is a positive literal that is then negated. And the absolute value of the maximum representable...

(1) is not specific to variadics either. That's just how positional arguments are displayed in the docs because that's also how they work in code.

I understand the desire, but at the same time the whole idea of raw is that it has no escape sequences, just n+1 backticks where n is the maximum number...

The documentation is perhaps a bit misleading here. In general, everything except for a few things (text, inline equations, boxes) is block-level and so is `place`. However, it will not...

I think the original version with `return` was fine and more readable. Regarding the clean up: The better version is probably: ``` .filter(|output| output.status.success()) ``` The general change seems good,...

@frozolotl is on point here with the reasoning. if the message is too vague, we can add a hint.

> @laurmaedje Is the hint different than the message printed in the console? Could you clarify what you mean?