Laurenz
Based on the number of upvotes on the latest comment, I'll close this.
@RafailFridman No current news, but I wanted to take a look at this before 0.12.
We want to migrate away from calc in favor of methods on individual types (which can also be called in fully qualified form, e.g. `float.sqrt(4)`). So, in this design, the...
@Jollywatt from your reaction to my last message, it seems like you are not in favor of this change to methods. is there anything in particular that you don't like...
> Either way, it’s probably best to hold off on this until the calc api settles? Yeah. I'll close this for now.
> I'd argue, adding `-> none` to every method that does that would clutter the documentation and not actually provide valuable insight and could even be more confusing to the...
> Maybe you can open-source the generator or implement a framework for adding translations? Maybe, but it will take a bit of work to separate it from our website.
Wait, how is this related to #460, which talks about general equation alignment whereas this changing the behaviour of matrics? Edit: Okay, that issue talks about both things.
For equation alignment with `&`, I think alternating makes sense, but for matrices it seems strange. They should just have an `align` parameter, e.g. `mat(-1, 1; 1, -1; align: #left)`....