Kyle Barron

Results 717 issues of Kyle Barron

GDAL 3.6 added support for a column-oriented API in [RFC 86](https://gdal.org/development/rfc/rfc86_column_oriented_api.html). This is a feature request to add an API for this in the Rust bindings. For higher-level bindings to...

From looking at some examples, it appears that data is always loaded to float64 arrays. For example in https://github.com/gjoseph92/stackstac/blob/5f984b211993380955b5d3f9eba3f3e285f6952c/examples/show.ipynb, loading the RGB bands of a Sentinel 2 asset (`rgb =...

Creative Commons [recommends against](https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-apply-a-creative-commons-license-to-software) using a Creative Commons license for software: > We recommend against using Creative Commons licenses for software. Instead, we strongly encourage you to use one of...

It appears that `-j` doesn't work with an _expression_, but only the deprecated filter syntax, is that true? (Given that the link in the README points to https://docs.mapbox.com/mapbox-gl-js/style-spec/#other-filter, which says...

👋 Recent versions of Python support optional static typing, including [TypedDict](https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0589), a way to define the types of properties on a dictionary. I see this project already [requires 3.6 or...

help wanted
enhancement

👋 I saw https://github.com/mapbox/mercantile/issues/140 and since @sgillies was receptive to the idea of adding type hints, I thought I'd also start a discussion here about adding type hints 🙂 ....

The current state of the cookiecutter doesn't support Python's [namespace packaging](https://packaging.python.org/guides/packaging-namespace-packages/#native-namespace-packages). The cookiecutter assumes that the Python package name coincides with the directory to Python files. For namespace packages this...

So far the spec has only covered single-file Parquet data. However Parquet also supports saving as a "dataset", where there are several Parquet files in a folder structure. In this...

Sensible for that output to be of shape `(-1, 3)`

Right now I think the algorithm assumes the x, y, z axes have the same coordinate system... While you wouldn't want to modify the algorithm itself, you could test multiplying...