Kasper Peeters

This was included in f182982c17e for input cells which are of `python/cadabra` type. Should still be extended to `latex` cells.

Also see #156. To some extent this is a duplicate of #110.

It is not so much 'what is to my liking' but more 'what works for you'. Having said that, I think there is something to be said for a `\transpose{...}`...

If you want `T_{\mu \nu m n}` to be symmetric in the greek indices and anti-symmetric in the latin ones, you can do T_{\mu\nu m n}::TableauSymmetry(shape={2}, indices={0,1}, shape={1,1}, indices={2,3}); I...

That's right; TableauSymmetry just implements standard symmetrisation over rows & anti-symmetrisation over columns, it does not do trace subtraction (so strictly speaking this does not put the tensors in an...

Once all the features I wanted for 2.x are in I will have a closer look at some of the (very) old code which is responsible for this.

Just to let you know that this is being worked on; most of it comes from the fact that `product_rule` acting on a product of a degree=0 form `f` and...

Can you run that test command directly, so /usr/bin/python3.8 "/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/cadabra2-2.3.2/core/cadabra2" "/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/cadabra2-2.3.2/tests/components.cdb" and post the output? (I can never figure out how to make ctest spit out *all* output of the...

Can you try to cut-n-paste those lines from test28 (the 2nd one...) into `cadabra2` and let me know where the thing segfaults?

If you run with `cadabra2 -d`, it will run inside `gdb`, and drop you to the `gdb` prompt when it crashes. Can you get a backtrace with the `bt` command...