Konrad Mattheis

Hi @marcusoffesson, this should work, but this mixin.methods is at least at the moment not documented. If this is already in the product please extend https://github.com/qlik-oss/enigma.js/blob/2fe4538cdeeb6d2a174cd78cf96906de91bcfce5/docs/api.md#mixins

Hi @marcusoffesson, okay, the design proposal sounds great, so this would perfectly work.

Hey @peol, thanks for the longer discussion. I fully understand now the issue of the delta, because if both enigma.js make a call GetObject("IDXX") they get the same handle from...

@ralfbecher I have discussed that feature already in a longer session. The tricky point is the delta mode and that the new enigma don't know the history of the objects....

@peol I really like the idea of mixins, but please separate this in two different packages: 1. helpers (Naming, Doc/Global in API,...) 2. caching, garbage collection I really like the...

@peol for the topic naming: I really prefer if qlik would change the api of the engine and this mixings could be the backward compatible option, to don't break existing...

+1 yes this would be great. please think of deregistration please think of the possibility to ask/check if a mixin is already applied please think of namespaces: in modularized enviroment...

Hi henningniss , What I miss in your DNA File is the bouncing castle dll, but I didn't test your problem till now. If you like you can also check...

Hi augustoproiete, you can just use that tool as a build task: http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/37133/Simple-Version-Resource-Tool-for-Windows All the other ways doesn't make sense in my eyes, because nobody want to compile the xll...

@augustoproiete and @govert If you look to the source of the verpatch you see that is much more complex to update the Versionattributes ond a exe because there are no...