kkthxbye

Would you mind splitting this up into two seperate feature requests, with this issue being for adopting child interfaces? Regarding adopting child interfaces, the logic seems sound to me. As...

A reason I can see, is that child interfaces do not get removed when removing the module if the child interface is not associated with the module.

I however still think it makes sense to associate virtual child interfaces with the installed module directly. I guess it depends on what you expect when going to the installed...

@sleepinggenius2 - Do you have any input here? Do you have a usecase for explictily assigning virtual child interfaces to the module. Removing child interfaces when removing modules make sense...

Not sure where to go from here. Deleting child interfaces when deleting the parent should be as easy as setting the on_delete to cascade. I don't see how we can...

> "Component" link should be changed to Device B Should it? I agree that there is a bug here as moving an interface item with a link to a component...

@DanSheps - I'm not sure I follow Dan. Are you saying it should be like that or that it is? Because Device is definitely not just a filter field in...

@fionera - Please provide the full stack trace from the logs.

@cpund - All yours.

> I am however not sure if it is safe to leave it running like this? Removing the disconnect from the context manager means that the already connected receivers are...