kkthxbye

I have looked at this in the past, and am still considering implementing it as we use Juniper devices like the ones in your example. I think there's a couple...

> Isn't unlimited nesting already allowed in other places? Like regions? I don't see any actual downside to allowing unlimited nesting if we figure out a good way for the...

It's still possible to change the device id via. the API. At the very least we should align the UI and API. See also: #9898

Closing this as there's been no response to the request for a stack trace.

@BrunoBlanes - You can prevent creation during form validation using custom validators, not sure if that is a usable workaround for you specific usecase.

https://docs.netbox.dev/en/stable/customization/custom-validation/ Under `Custom Validation Logic` you can see a small example. You would have to write a manual check in python. if I understand your issue correctly, you would have...

I'll give this another chance as I think it's an import feature, if no one picks it up soon, I'll give it a shot myself.

@jbakklund - There's no relation between racks and providers. If you meant in a general sense, racks already have tenant group -> tenant.

I think this makes sense, not sure if the omission was intentional or just an oversight during the implementation. Perhaps @jeremystretch can shed some light? If it was unintended, we...

@JakobLichterfeld - Your answer was rude and weirdly emotional. I was in no way promoting the image, just trying to have calmer heads prevail and provide some actual investigation. Your...