Faseela K
Faseela K
@liuxu623 you need a rebase on this PR as well?
> > @liuxu623 you need a rebase on this PR as well? > > @kfaseela Please help me review code, thank you. sure..will do.. but considering this is an API...
> Do you have a high-level design? There are too many factors to consider for multi-tenants, we need a design. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1y4liRJbQW0NCMeQtqMma46flVqs-izV1/
@ZhiHanZ @lizan Any history on why there was no activity on this PR further?
@ZhiHanZ : If you are not planning to pursue this(I assume so, as there is no activity for quite sometime now), is it okay if I pick this up for...
FYI: I have created the below RFC to resume work on this task : https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pTUl-Ng3nXAWJb7UGJtalftznpxQEfID/edit
As per the latest discussions in the networking working group, an API change is not needed for supporting the same. The details are updated in the RFC, I think if...
/test integ-security-multicluster
> LGTM. I will let @ericvn to take a look before approving it. Thanks for the review @lei-tang . Though the test is running now, and passing in most of...