Dariusz Rumiński
Dariusz Rumiński
@BackEndTea sounds like great idea, could you create a PR ?
before I invest time into it, I would love to hear some opinions about the direction. Please treat this draft as RFC - what do you think? cc @localheinz @julienfalque...
I don't mind much about current engagement in the project (of course, love to see it, but I also understand when someone need to focus somewhere else - had it...
> kind vs type agree. i took approach to not affect whatever we already have operating and experiment on fresh ground, in parallel. if it works, we should get rid...
root of duplicated import is not fixer rule that, for whatever reason, add a duplicate and it sneaks under tokenizing linter, but that user BEFORE fixing already have duplicated import...
sorry, not sure if I pick up the question around fabpot/* namespace, can you clarify?
I do not recall any alignment on direction for those elements I mentioned. Maybe because tight year (for me) and lack of capacity as high as yours.
I understand that you have the vision and that we didn't had a chance to get enough attention from my side to conclude on it - and while you have...
I'm not sure if it's really a duplicate. 7460 wants to convert `\foo\bar();` into `bar();` (feature) while this PR asks to prevent `\foo\bar::class` into `bar::class` conversion (bug)
can you link a test case in your PR that covers `\myNs\myFunction::class` case described by this issue?