Kai Krakow
Kai Krakow
I wonder why it failed because dkms was using the MOK commands to sign the module... Thus, it should work with secureboot.
Reopening, because disabling secureboot is not an acceptable solution.
Thanks for finding the issue. Please keep this opened so I can document it.
How is this backwards compatible with older versions? Where is the documentation pointing to such a breaking change in systemd?
Okay, I see that your link in the commit points to the changelog. This doesn't indicate that anything breaks: We already use `add|change` - so check for both events that...
> > How is this backwards compatible with older versions? > > Hi, thanks for your prompt answer. I work closely with the systemd developers, and the current approach where...
Thanks, this look useful. I'll first let Copilot do a review. I'll look into this soon, I hope. I'm currently lacking some time.
Given the discussion, I'm guessing this script is mainly used for manual installation, not for the module being managed by dkms? Tho, your doc patches say "if you use dkms..."....
Sounds promising, I really appreciate it but will need to find some spare time to test it in a VM.
> I have a problem on my system though. I guess I have firmware 5.x since the module is not working without `uhid` I'm not sure how we should properly...